UMaine crest
 
You're in a Great Place!  
 


Center for Community Inclusion &
 Disability Studies


  CCIDS Home
  Interdisciplinary
  Education
  Research

  Service
  Resources
  Calendar of Events
  Faculty & Staff
  Projects &
  Initiatives
  Site map
  Related Links
  Search CCIDS
  UMaine Home

 


 

 

Prevention Center of Excellence

 

Prevention Center of Excellence

Annotated Bibliography: Geographic Information Systems & Public Health

Annotated Bibliography: Geographic Information Systems & Public Health available in PDF. Adobe Acrobat PDF(Download Acrobat Reader)

Compiled by Clare Desrosiers
March 1, 2006

Austin, S.B., Melly, S.J., Sanchez, B.N., Patel, A., Buka, S., & Gortmaker, S.L. (2005). Clustering of fast-food restaurants around schools: A novel application of spatial statistics to the study of food environment. American Journal of Public Health, 95(9), 1575-1581.

The article presents a study that utilized GIS mapping to answer research questions about clustering of fast-food restaurants around schools.

Caley, L.M. (2004). Using geographic information systems to design population-based interventions. Public Health Nursing, 21(6), 547-554.

The article describes a project designed to pilot-test the use of GIS for development of population-based interventions. The author concludes that GIS has potential for use in this manner, although there are a number of challenges. She recommends ways to address these challenges to ensure that GIS maps reflect what they are intended to reflect and can be accurately interpreted. Finally, the author briefly discusses ethical and confidentiality issues.

Cromley, E.K. (2003). GIS and disease. Annual Review of Public Health, 24, 7-24.

In this article, the author reviews the ways GISs are used to examine the relationships of geographical environments to both health outcomes and diseases or people who have diseases. She describes the kind of data needed to do so and where to find some of the data. The author briefly discusses problems that can arise when using zip codes as area identifiers in GIS mapping.

Croner, C.M. (2003). Public health, GIS, and the Internet. Annual Review of Public Health, 24, 57-82.

The author discusses the benefits of making geospatial data accessible on the internet, methods for protecting confidentiality of the data, the availability of public health geospatial data on the internet and technological advances that need to be accomplished to overcome barriers. The article provides website addresses for public health data and statistics for GIS mapping. The author recommends that individual agencies wishing to utilize GIS share resources and work together because geospatial technologies are costly. The article includes a small glossary of geospatial terms.

Elliott, P., & Wartenberg, D. (2004). Spatial epidemiology: Current approaches and future challenges. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(9), 998-1006.

The article presents the advantages and disadvantages of using GISs to map diseases. The authors recommend several strategies to avoid information errors commonly associated with GISs. See GIS research options summary for additional information.

Fulcher, C., & Kaukinen, C. (2005). Mapping and visualizing the location of HIV service providers: An exploratory spatial analysis of Toronto neighborhoods. AIDS Care, 17(3), 386-396.

The article describes a study in which GIS mapping was used to locate HIV service providers and determine the minimum distance from each identified Toronto neighborhood to service providers in general and specific types of providers. The authors describe the type of GIS map and spatial statistics utilized in the study. GIS mapping was an effective tool for answering the researchers’ questions.

Hassan, M.M. (2005). Arsenic poisoning in Bangladesh: Spatial mitigation planning with GIS and public participation. Health Policy, 74, 247-260.

The article describes a qualitative study in which the author explored the usefulness of a public participatory GIS (PPGIS), in collaboration with local community members, to establish potential sites for deep tubewells. The author concludes that the PPGIS was a useful tool because it helped community members identify sites that would not necessarily have been identified if their input had not been sought and a map had not been presented to them before the sites were chosen.

Hendryx, M.S., Ahern, M.M., Lovrich, N.P., & McCurdy, A.H. (2002). Access to health care and community social capital. Health Services Research, 37(1), 87-103.

Although this study does not utilize a GIS, it does examine issues related to accessibility. Specifically, what kind of relationship exists between access to health care and community social capital. Authors conclude that study findings suggest social capital may play a role in access to health care.

Jacquez, G.M. (2000). Spatial analysis in epidemiology: Nascent science or a failure of GIS? Journal of Geographic Systems, 2, 91-97.

The article describes the benefits and limitations of using GISs in public health research, and specifically epidemiology. It lists several types of spatial statistical models that can be used to analyze data.

Jarup, L. (2004). Health and environment information systems for exposure and disease mapping and risk assessment. Environmental Health Perspectives, 112(9), 995-997.

The article discusses how GISs can be used to make maps of exposure and/or disease. Mapping strategies that could be used in prevention work include: (1) identify possible disease clusters - to define and monitor epidemics, provide baseline data on health patterns, and map changes in disease patterns over time; (2) perform risk assessment – once baseline pattern of disease is defined, continue mapping of disease pattern over time, explore changes in disease patterns potentially associated with changes in the environment. The author warns that small-area maps are more difficult to produce and interpret in a meaningful way.

Jenks, R.H., & Malecki, J.M. (2004). GIS – A proven tool for public health analysis. Journal of Environmental Health, 67(3), 32-34.

The authors discuss the advantages of using GIS for public health analysis and provide a number of guidelines on how to do so effectively.

Kabateriene, N.B., Brooker, S., Tukahebwa, E.M., Kazibwe, F., & Onapa, A.W. (2004). Epidemiology and geography of Schistosoma mansoni in Uganda: Implications for planning control. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 9(3), 372-380.

The article presents findings from a study that utilized a GIS to examine the incidence and location of infections with schistosoma mansoni. The GIS was a very effective way to answer some of the researchers’ questions. The authors highlight how GISs provide policy makers with a visual representation of problems in relation to the natural environment and population.

Li, F., Fisher, K.J., Bauman, A., Ory, M.G., Chodzko-Zajko, W., Harmer, P., Bosworth, M., & Cleveland, M. (2005). Neighborhood influences on physical activity in middle-aged and older adults: A multilevel perspective. Journal of Aging and Physical Activity, 13, 87-114.

The article reviews literature related to influences on physical activity and research methods for examining those influences. The authors discuss the use of GIS mapping as one technique for objectively examining environmental and physical influences. From their review of the research literature, they also discuss what type of geographic unit should be used with GIS mapping. The authors recommend a multilevel approach to research regarding physical activity. Their recommendations for research could be applied to research related to substance abuse use and availability of substance abuse prevention services.

Martin, D., Wrigley, H., Barnett, S., & Roderick, P. (2002). Increasing the sophistication of access measurement in a rural healthcare study. Health and Place, 8, 3-13.

The article reviews the ways in which access to health care has been analyzed in the research literature, especially in relation to measurement of distances traveled to health care facilities.

McLafferty, S.L. (2003). GIS and health care. Annual Review of Public Health, 24, 25-42.

The article discusses the ways in which GISs are and can be used in public health research. It provides numerous recommendations on how to do so in a manner that will produce maps that accurately reflect what they are intended to reflect. The article includes a description of spatial analysis methods. The author notes that GIS has great potential for identifying vulnerable populations in relation to geographical access to quality services and treatments.

Noor, A.M., Zurovac, D., Hay, S.I., Ochola, S.A., & Snow, R.W. (2003). Defining equity in physical access to clinical services using geographical information systems as part of malaria planning and monitoring in Kenya. Tropical Medicine and International Health, 8(10), 917-926.

The article reports on findings from a study on physical access to clinical services and provides in depth information on how researchers used GISs and spatial analysis to answer their research questions. Authors conclude that their study demonstrated that spatial data on population and health service location “can be used within GIS to define physical access and that this corresponds closely to actual usage of services for fevers.”

Phillips, R.L., Kinman, E.L., Schnitzer, P.G., Lindbloom, E.J., & Ewigman, B. (2000). Using geographic information systems to understand health care access. Archive of Family Medicine, 9, 971-978.

The authors describe a study in which they used a GIS to examine (1) whether community health care centers, strategically placed in areas with underserved populations, actually increased accessibility and (2) the relationships between access to health care centers, poverty, and political boundaries. The authors conclude that the use of a GIS was helpful in answering research questions. Census block groups were used to map locations of study subjects.

Pine, J.C., & Diaz, J.H. (2000). Environmental health screening with GIS: Creating a community environmental health profile. Environmental Health, 9-15.

The article describes how GISs can be used to examine relationships between the public health and the environment as well as for risk assessments. Authors assert that GISs can be very helpful in this process.

Renger, R., Cimetta, A., Pettygrove, S., & Rogan, S. (2002). Geographic information systems (GIS) as an evaluation tool. American Journal of Evaluation, 23(4), 469-479.

The article describes a study in which a GIS was used to depict change in a neighborhood revitalization area. The authors provide detailed instructions on how they did this in the GIS. They demonstrate that it is possible to represent change over a period of time with a GIS. The article includes references for a number of data sources and resources.

Ricketts, T.C., Randolph, R., Howard, H.A., Pathman, D., & Carey, T. (2001). Hospitalization rates as indicators of access to primary care. Health and Place, 7, 27-38.

The article describes a study that used a GIS and statistical analyses to examine access to primary care in relation to other variables. The article is helpful because it provides a detailed description of the analysis process.

Riner, M.E., Cunningham, C., & Johnson, A. (2004). Public health education and practice using geographic information system technology. Public Health Nursing, 2(1), 57-65.

The authors describe past, present, and future roles of GISs in public health and present a public health situation in which a GIS was used. One way in which the GIS was used, that could be relevant for prevention research, is to locate “hot spots” of the target disease in the study area and update with weekly overlays of new cases to ongoingly identify areas of need and provide prevention services before the identified problem gets too large.

Susi, L., Mascarenhas, A.K. (2002). Using a geographical information system to map the distribution of dentists in Ohio. Journal of the American Dental Association, 133, 636-642.

The article describes an analysis that used a GIS to examine the availability of dental care at both county and zip code levels. An important observation is that the analysis at the zip code level revealed more disparities than that at the county level.

Telfair, J., Haque, A., Etienne, M., Tang, S., & Strasser, S. (2003). Rural/urban differences in access to and utilization of services among people in Alabama with Sickle Cell Disease. Public Health Reports, 118, 27-36.

The article describes a study that used GIS mapping to examine associations between participants’ geographic location, socioeconomic factors, and utilization of health care services. Zip codes were used with a GIS to distinguish urban and rural locations. GIS was also used to map distance from a participants’ geographic location and closest medical/health clinic. Regression analysis was used to examine the relationships between variables.

Yang, G., Vounatsou, P., Zhou, X., Utzinger, J., & Tanner, M. (2005). A review of geographic information system and remote sensing with application to the epidemiology and control of schistosomiasis in China. Acta Tropica, 96, 117-129.

Authors review the ways in which GISs are used (1) to represent infection risk and transmission and (2) identify and predict risk areas. The research literature reviewed by the authors consistently demonstrated the usefulness of GIS technologies to represent risk and predict transmission. Such technologies could potentially be applied to substance abuse prevention research in these two ways. The authors warn that maps generated from population sizes that are too small or too large can be misleading. They indicate that there are empirical ways to overcome these problems. The authors also note that disease frequency and transmission are influenced by multiple factors.

Zenk, S.N., Schulz, A.J., Israel, B.A., James, S.A., Bao, S., & Wilson, M.L. (2005). Neighborhood racial composition, neighborhood poverty, and the spatial accessibility of supermarkets in metropolitan Detroit. Research and Practice, 95(4), 660-666.

The article presents findings from the study described in the title. A GIS was used to calculate distance between the centers of neighborhoods and supermarkets. The article provides a detailed description of the kind of data analyses used to answer study questions.

| PCoE Home | PCoE Research Materials | PCoE Additional Resources |

Center for Community Inclusion and Disability Studies
5717 Corbett Hall, Rm 114
The University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469
Phone: 207/581-1084

The University of Maine
Orono, Maine 04469
207/581-1110
A Member of the University of Maine System